lovebird21cFor public choice theorists, regulatory capture occurs because groups or individuals with a high-stakes interest in the outcome of policy or regulatory decisions can be expected to focus their resources and energies in attempting to gain the policy outcomes they prefer, while members of the public, each with only a tiny individual stake in the outcome, will ignore it altogether. Regulatory capture refers to when this imbalance of focused resources devoted to a particular policy outcome is successful at "capturing" influence with the staff or commission members of the regulatory agency, so that the preferred policy outcomes of the special interest are implemented.
lovebird21cWikipedia: The idea of regulatory capture has an obvious economic basis in that vested interests in an industry have the greatest financial stake in regulatory activity and are more likely to be motivated to influence the regulatory body than dispersed individual consumers, each of whom has little particular incentive to try to influence regulators. When regulators form expert bodies to examine policy, this invariably featured current or former industry members, or at the very least, individuals with contacts in the industry.
Some economists, such as Jon Hanson and his co-authors, argue that the phenomenon extends beyond just political agencies and organizations. Businesses have an incentive to control anything that has power over them, including institutions from the media to academia to popular culture, and thus will try to capture them as well. They call this phenomenon "deep capture."
langdu'áp chế đảo chiều của đối tượng điều chỉnh', 'điều tiết bị trói': do học giả Nobel George Stigler đưa ra. Đó là quá trình các cơ quan giám sát thực thi pháp luật rốt cục bị chính các đối tượng điều chỉnh áp chế. Hiện tượng này xảy ra khi một cơ quan giám sát thay vì phụng sự mục tiêu lợi ích công của toàn xã hội lại đi phụng sự lợi ích riêng của một hay một nhóm doanh nghiệp.
video
Thư viện
Tài trợ
Some economists, such as Jon Hanson and his co-authors, argue that the phenomenon extends beyond just political agencies and organizations. Businesses have an incentive to control anything that has power over them, including institutions from the media to academia to popular culture, and thus will try to capture them as well. They call this phenomenon "deep capture."