Vì sao Mỹ rút máy bay ném bom khỏi Guam?

trong khi tq ngày càng củng cố sức mạnh quân sự thì mỹ lại rút đi...

cải tổ hải quân? giảm số hàng không mẫu hạm từ 11 xuống còn 9 (giảm 2)
-----
...One theory is that the US base on Guam, which includes Andersen Air Force Base, is vulnerable (dễ bị tổn thương) to missile (tên lửa) or bomber (máy bay ném bom) attacks (vụ tấn công) from China. If true, will the US also pull back from Naval Base Guam, the other major base on the island? And what about US bases on Okinawa, Japan and Korea? Are these bases also vulnerable?

The short answer is that the build-up of China’s military, expansion of its navy, deployment (triển khai) of new strategic (chiến lược) bombers, submarines (tàu ngầm), surface combatants and two aircraft carriers is shifting the region’s balance of power (cân bằng quyền lực). But wouldn’t the logical response be to strengthen the US military posture in East Asia, instead of yanking bombers back to the US?

Part of the US Air Force’s concern is China’s DF-26 missile, sometimes referred to as the “Guam Killer.” The DF-26 is said to be capable of hitting targets up to 5,471 kilometers away with nuclear or conventional warheads (đầu đạn).

If the DF-26 is the real threat, then the next step should be closing Naval base Guam, where the Covid-19 afflicted (làm đau đớn, làm đau buồn, làm ưu phiền, làm khổ sở) US aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt is now berthed. No such plan has been put forward, at least not yet.

Post a Comment

Tin liên quan

    Tài chính

    Trung Quốc