Chúng tôi ủng hộ

-----

Newsweek reports on Todd Zywicki’s courageous lawsuit (vụ kiện dũng cảm). A slice:

While one plausible (hợp lý, đáng tin cậy; có miệng lưỡi khéo léo, dẻo miệng) solution (giải pháp) is for Zywicki to work and teach from home, Younes said Zywicki doesn’t see that as an acceptable (chấp nhận được) long-term (dài hạn)) remedy (điều trị, chữa trị).

“This is not a situation where he’s guessing he had COVID. He’s had many antibody tests—he’s had a number of them as recently as June, which showed very robust immunity levels,” [Jenin] Younes told Newsweek. “Where we’re talking about following the science there’s really no reason to treat him differently than other vaccinated colleagues.”

The 37-page letter sent by the Alliance to university leaders included a lengthy statement by Noorchashm and a joint statement from Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford and Dr. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard, both agreeing Zywicki should be exempt (miễn trừ). The two cited several studies to that point.

“If you have COVID and recover, then you have natural immunity, that’s how the immune system works,” Kulldorff, who has studied vaccines for many years, told Newsweek.“The vaccine works in the same way because it makes your immune system work without having the disease so having had the disease provides at least as good or better immunity than you’d have from the vaccine.”

From a public health standpoint Kulldorff also noted that by forcing people who are already immune to take the vaccine could take the vaccine away from others who need it.

Bài trước: Phải làm gì khi công ty bắt tiêm vắc-xin mới được đi làm?