video
Thư viện
Tài trợ
Rất phức tộp
08 Jun, 2020
xếp chỗ ngồi cho 20 người đã khó,
thì làm sao có thể xử lý hàng tỷ đầu vào, chỉ với bộ phận đầu não ở washington, nếu ko có local knowledge, no feedback mechanism, and no skin in the game...
-----
When I was young, the number of family members gathered for our family’s Thanksgiving dinner was about 20 – a large dinner gathering, yes, but nothing out of the ordinary (không có gì là ko bình thường). Yet the number of different ways to arrange the seating of a mere 20 people around a dinner table is – drumroll! – 2,432,902,008,176,640,000.
A number this large has no non-scientific name. It is inconceivably high and unimaginably humongous. It’s just a bit larger, by a mere several thousand trillion, but roughly equivalent to this number: 2,428,272,000,000,000,000 – which is the number of seconds (as in “60 seconds in a minute”) there are in 77 billion years. Note that astronomers (nhà thiên văn học) estimate the universe’s age to be 13.8 billion years.
I didn’t write the above to impress (gây ấn tượng) you with my knowledge of advanced arithmetic (số học) or my ability to google “How old is the universe?” I wrote the above to make a point about the economy.
Solving economic problems – creating value – requires discovering how to arrange inputs productively. The number of inputs available for use is not 20 or even 20,000; it’s in the billions. Therefore the factorial operation means that the number of possible ways to arrange these billions of inputs is indescribably far beyond human comprehension (vượt xa sự hiểu biết của con người). Yet only a minuscule fraction of these ways has any prospect of being productive. Almost all possible arrangements are useless or even dangerous.
One among these countless arrangements is gin mixed with turpentine (nhựa thông?) and anchovies (cá trồng), but the resulting martini would be terrible. How best to discover the vanishingly small number of productive arrangements out of the sprawling and gigantic number of possible arrangements?
Obviously, relying on random chance will not do. Equally futile would be reliance on what on the surface appears to be the opposite of random chance: central planning. No human being or committee could possibly even survey and list all of the possible different arrangements of billions or inputs. Much less could any individual genius, or agency of geniuses, discover from this vast list of possibilities which of these arrangements are most useful compared to the uncountably large number of other possible arrangements.
Given the puniness of the human mind relative to the incalculable (không thể tính được) number of possible different arrangements of an economy’s inputs, to turn over to government the responsibility for choosing how resources should be allocated is, in effect, to rely upon random chance.
Bài trước: Nhớ xét cả hai mặt
Tags: economics
Post a Comment